CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe vs Volvo EX90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe vs Volvo EX90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzVolvo
Price (RRP)$111,400$106,990
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)479km
Battery92 kWh
Power190kW245kW
0-100 km/h7s6.8s
Max DC Charge300kW
Fuel Economy7.7 L/100km
Boot Space570L384L
Towing2,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe & Volvo EX90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe starts from $111,400 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX90 opens at $106,990. That makes the Volvo EX90 the more affordable entry point by $4,410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $122,540 and $117,689 respectively.

The Volvo EX90 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and Volvo EX90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and 92% for the Volvo EX90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe, against 6 on the Volvo EX90.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and 9 in the Volvo EX90.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

92kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 28m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

18 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe features a 11.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX90 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe stands out with Burmester audio that you will not find on the Volvo EX90. The Volvo EX90 counters with ventilated seats and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo EX90 offers nordico/microtech. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and 4-zone in the Volvo EX90.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe uses a Petrol producing 190kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Volvo EX90 responds with a Electric making 245kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The Volvo EX90 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 190kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX90 is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Boot space is 570L in the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and 384L in the Volvo EX90, giving the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe a 186L advantage. The Volvo EX90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.9m to 12.2m

TightestMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe GLC300 4MATICTightest turn at 11.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe GLC300 4MATIC
11.9mTighter
Best
Volvo EX90 Plus Single Motor
12.2m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe GLC300 4MATIC
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo EX90 Plus Single Motor
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz GLC CoupeTightest turn at 11.9m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz GLC CoupeTightest11.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo EX9012.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX90 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo EX90 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and Volvo EX90?

The Volvo EX90 is the cheapest at $106,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe by $4,410.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe and Volvo EX90 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX90 makes the most power at 245kW. The Volvo EX90 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs