MG Cyberster vs Volvo C70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 12 Aug 2026, price 8 Sep 2026
MG Cyberster
From $99,900
Convertible
Electric
Electric Motor
375kW
—
ANCAP: no data
249L
Volvo C70
Price TBC
Convertible
Petrol
—
125kW
9.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
404L
Volvo C70: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the MG Cyberster & Volvo C70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
74kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 144kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 144kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The MG Cyberster stands out with Apple CarPlay, head-up display and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo C70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The MG Cyberster uses a Electric Motor producing 375kW and 725Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.2 seconds.
The Volvo C70 lines up making 125kW and 230Nm, paired to a 5-speed geartronic automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10 seconds.
The MG Cyberster has the clear power advantage at 375kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the MG Cyberster is 6.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG Cyberster measures 4,535mm long on a 2,690mm wheelbase, 47mm shorter than the Volvo C70 at 4,582mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG Cyberster generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 249L in the MG Cyberster and 404L in the Volvo C70, giving the Volvo C70 a 155L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m diameter
Average
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG Cyberster if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo C70 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG Cyberster comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (58 vs 35), taking 2 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: performance (MG Cyberster ahead by 64), technology (MG Cyberster ahead by 38), safety (MG Cyberster ahead by 28). If boot space matters, the Volvo C70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG Cyberster and Volvo C70?
The MG Cyberster is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo C70 uses the least fuel at 9.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of MG Cyberster and Volvo C70 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volvo C70 has the largest boot at 404L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Volvo C70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG Cyberster makes the most power at 375kW. The MG Cyberster is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
