CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG ZS vs GAC Emzoom
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG ZS vs GAC Emzoom

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGGAC
Price (RRP)$22,990$25,590
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW125kW
0-100 km/h7.8s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space443L341L
Towing500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the MG ZS & GAC Emzoom

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the GAC Emzoom opens at $25,590. That makes the MG ZS the more affordable entry point by $2,600.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $28,149 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG ZS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GAC Emzoom gets a 14.6-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that the MG ZS does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG ZS gets cloth upholstery while the GAC Emzoom offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the MG ZS and 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom.

Drivetrain

The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The GAC Emzoom responds with a Petrol Turbo making 125kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 81kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the GAC Emzoom at 4,410mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 341L in the GAC Emzoom, giving the MG ZS a 102L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestMG ZS VibeTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
MG ZS Vibe
11.0mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
MG ZS Vibe
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMG ZSTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
MG ZSTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
GAC Emzoom11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG ZS) vs $1,881 (GAC Emzoom). The GAC Emzoom saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom). The MG ZS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG ZS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG ZS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG ZS and GAC Emzoom?

The MG ZS is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $2,600.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG ZS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs