CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs CUPRA Terramar
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs CUPRA Terramar

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiCUPRA
Price (RRP)$37,740$44,990
Power113kW110kW
0-100 km/h11.9s9.3s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.7 L/100km
Boot Space350L508L
Towing1,200kg1,800kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the CUPRA Terramar opens at $44,990. That makes the Mitsubishi ASX the more affordable entry point by $7,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $49,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi ASX features a 10.4-inch touchscreen, while the CUPRA Terramar gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi ASX stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the CUPRA Terramar. The CUPRA Terramar counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The CUPRA Terramar responds with a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the CUPRA Terramar is 2.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,270mm long on a 2,634mm wheelbase, 249mm shorter than the CUPRA Terramar at 4,519mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the CUPRA Terramar generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX and 508L in the CUPRA Terramar, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 158L advantage.

For towing, the CUPRA Terramar leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.4m

Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4mTighter
Best
CUPRA Terramar S
11.4m
Worst
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
CUPRA Terramar
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Terramar.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $1,625 (CUPRA Terramar). The CUPRA Terramar saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CUPRA Terramar takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The CUPRA Terramar will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Terramar has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi ASX and CUPRA Terramar?

The Mitsubishi ASX is the cheapest at $37,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Terramar by $7,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — CUPRA Terramar all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The CUPRA Terramar has the largest boot at 508L.

Which can tow the most?

The CUPRA Terramar has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The CUPRA Terramar is quickest to 100km/h in 9.3s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs