CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs Renault Arkana
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Arkana

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiRenault
Price (RRP)$37,740$39,990
Power113kW105kW
0-100 km/h11.9s9.4s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.2 L/100km
Boot Space350L430L
Towing1,200kg1,200kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the Renault Arkana opens at $39,990. That makes the Mitsubishi ASX the more affordable entry point by $2,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Arkana by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Renault Arkana holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mitsubishi ASX.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Renault Arkana packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX and 6 in the Renault Arkana.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi ASX features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Renault Arkana gets a 9.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi ASX gets cloth upholstery while the Renault Arkana offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Renault Arkana responds with a Petrol making 105kW and 205Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Arkana is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,270mm long on a 2,634mm wheelbase, 298mm shorter than the Renault Arkana at 4,568mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Arkana generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX and 430L in the Renault Arkana, giving the Renault Arkana a 80L advantage.

For towing, the Renault Arkana leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.8m

Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4mTighter
Best
Renault Arkana Intens
10.8m
Worst
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Arkana
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $1,482/year for the Renault Arkana. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Renault Arkana.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $1,482 (Renault Arkana). The Renault Arkana saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Arkana). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Arkana if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Arkana takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Renault Arkana will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Arkana has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi ASX and Renault Arkana?

The Mitsubishi ASX is the cheapest at $37,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Arkana by $2,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Arkana uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Renault Arkana has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Arkana has the largest boot at 430L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The Renault Arkana is quickest to 100km/h in 9.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs