Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
From $52,990
SUV
Diesel
133kW
8.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
131L
Jeep Grand Cherokee
From $65,950
SUV
Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS
210kW
9.9 L/100km
4★ ANCAP
1067L
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee opens at $65,950. That makes the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport the more affordable entry point by $12,960.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $72,545 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Jeep Grand Cherokee packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 6 in the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee gets a 10.1-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses a Diesel producing 133kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee responds with a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS making 210kW and 344Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic w/ paddle shifters driving the rear wheels.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport measures 4,785mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 129mm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee at 4,914mm (2,964mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Jeep Grand Cherokee generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 1067L in the Jeep Grand Cherokee, giving the Jeep Grand Cherokee a 936L advantage.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 2,813kg. That 287kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m diameter
Average
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and $2,822/year for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport) vs $2,822 (Jeep Grand Cherokee). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Grand Cherokee). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Jeep Grand Cherokee if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and Jeep Grand Cherokee?
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Grand Cherokee by $12,960.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the largest boot at 1067L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee makes the most power at 210kW.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
