CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Pajero vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Pajero vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$53,775
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power141kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Fuel Economy9.1 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space1069L200L
Towing3,000kg3,100kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mitsubishi Pajero & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Fortuner hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Fortuner packs more ADAS features with 1 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mitsubishi Pajero.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mitsubishi Pajero and 7 in the Toyota Fortuner.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Pajero features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Fortuner gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Pajero gets fabric upholstery while the Toyota Fortuner offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Pajero uses a 3.2L 4M41 DID Turbo Diesel producing 141kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed automatic (invecs-ii sports mode) to a 4WD layout.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 141kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Pajero measures 4,900mm long on a 2,780mm wheelbase, 105mm longer than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Pajero generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 1069L in the Mitsubishi Pajero and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Mitsubishi Pajero a 869L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 3,000kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

TightestMitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD AutoTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD Auto
11.4mTighter
Best
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m
Worst
Mitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD Auto
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi PajeroTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi PajeroTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota Fortuner11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,594/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Fortuner.

Estimated annual total: $2,594 (Mitsubishi Pajero) vs $2,166 (Toyota Fortuner). The Toyota Fortuner saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). The Mitsubishi Pajero has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 10yr (Mitsubishi Pajero)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Fortuner takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Fortuner will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Pajero has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Fortuner uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Fortuner all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Pajero has the largest boot at 1069L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Fortuner makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs