Mitsubishi Pajero vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mitsubishi Pajero
Price TBC
SUV
Diesel
3.2L 4M41 DID Turbo Diesel
141kW
9.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
1069L
Toyota LandCruiser 300
From $97,990
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Twin-Turbo V6
227kW
8.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
700L
Track the Mitsubishi Pajero & Toyota LandCruiser 300
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Both include the essentials: a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mitsubishi Pajero and 10 in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Pajero features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Pajero stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Pajero gets fabric upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Pajero and 2-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Pajero uses a 3.2L 4M41 DID Turbo Diesel producing 141kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed automatic (invecs-ii sports mode) to a 4WD layout.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 141kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Pajero measures 4,900mm long on a 2,780mm wheelbase, 80mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 300 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 1069L in the Mitsubishi Pajero and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Mitsubishi Pajero a 369L advantage. The Mitsubishi Pajero seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.8m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,594/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Toyota LandCruiser 300.
Estimated annual total: $2,594 (Mitsubishi Pajero) vs $2,537 (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Toyota LandCruiser 300 saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Mitsubishi Pajero has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 10yr (Mitsubishi Pajero)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Pajero has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota LandCruiser 300?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 uses the least fuel at 8.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mitsubishi Pajero has the largest boot at 1069L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Pajero has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
