Mitsubishi Triton vs Volkswagen Amarok
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Triton starts from $43,690 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Amarok opens at $55,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $12,300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,059 and $61,589 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mitsubishi Triton and Volkswagen Amarok hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Mitsubishi Triton and 86% for the Volkswagen Amarok.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volkswagen Amarok packs more ADAS features with 3 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Triton.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Triton and 6 in the Volkswagen Amarok.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the Volkswagen Amarok gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Volkswagen Amarok responds with a Diesel making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen Amarok is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 30mm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok at 5,350mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Amarok generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Volkswagen Amarok leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m to 12.9m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $2,280/year for the Volkswagen Amarok. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton) vs $2,280 (Volkswagen Amarok). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Amarok). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volkswagen Amarok if: You or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Triton takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Volkswagen Amarok?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen Amarok by $12,300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton and Volkswagen Amarok all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volkswagen Amarok has the largest boot at 543L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW. The Volkswagen Amarok is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
