CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan X-Trail vs MG MG HS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan X-Trail vs MG MG HS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanMG
Price (RRP)$37,750$33,990
Power135kW125kW
0-100 km/h8s8.6s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space205L507L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 300k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Nissan X-Trail starts from $37,750 before on-road costs, while the MG MG HS opens at $33,990. That makes the MG MG HS the more affordable entry point by $3,760.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,525 and $37,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the MG MG HS by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan X-Trail and MG MG HS hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Nissan X-Trail and 92% for the MG MG HS.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Nissan X-Trail packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the MG MG HS.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan X-Trail and 6 in the MG MG HS.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan X-Trail features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the MG MG HS gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG HS counters with panoramic roof and power tailgate that the Nissan X-Trail does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan X-Trail lines up producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The MG MG HS responds with a Petrol making 125kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,680mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 10mm longer than the MG MG HS at 4,670mm (2,765mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 205L in the Nissan X-Trail and 507L in the MG MG HS, giving the MG MG HS a 302L advantage.

For towing, the MG MG HS leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.0mTighter
Best
MG MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Best
Nissan X-Trail
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG MG HS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $1,853/year for the MG MG HS. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the MG MG HS.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $1,853 (MG MG HS). The MG MG HS saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 300,000km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG HS). The MG MG HS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG HS takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The MG MG HS will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG MG HS has a clear edge. The MG MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and MG MG HS?

The MG MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan X-Trail by $3,760.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The MG MG HS uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan X-Trail and MG MG HS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG MG HS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs