Nissan X-Trail vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Nissan X-Trail
From $28,490
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
102kW
8.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Suzuki Fronx
From $28,490
SUV
Hybrid
Petrol
75.8kW
4.9 L/100km
1★ ANCAP
304L
Track the Nissan X-Trail & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Nissan X-Trail starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $5,130 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Suzuki Fronx counters with Apple CarPlay that the Nissan X-Trail does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Nissan X-Trail uses a Petrol producing 102kW and 198Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a 2WD layout.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 102kW vs 75.8kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,635mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 640mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan X-Trail generally means more rear legroom.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $1,026 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $1,026 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 6yr (Nissan X-Trail)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Nissan X-Trail takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $1,026 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and Suzuki Fronx?
The Nissan X-Trail is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Fronx all hold a 1-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 102kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
