CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Nissan Z vs Audi TTS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Z vs Audi TTS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Audi TTS: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecNissanAudi
Price (RRP)$76,160$95,100
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power298kW200kW
0-100 km/h4.6s5.2s
Fuel Economy10.8 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space241L—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Nissan Z & Audi TTS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan Z starts from $76,160 before on-road costs, while the Audi TTS opens at $95,100. That makes the Nissan Z the more affordable entry point by $18,940.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,776 and $104,610 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi TTS by roughly $4,130 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Nissan Z stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Audi TTS. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Z uses a Petrol producing 298kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.6 seconds.

The Audi TTS responds with a 2.0-litre 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol (TFSI) making 200kW and 350Nm, paired to a s tronic 6-speed dual-clutch gearbox driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.2 seconds.

The Nissan Z has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 200kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Nissan Z is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0m
←
Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Nissan Z Turning circle · Ø 11.0 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.8 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,078/year for the Nissan Z and $2,252/year for the Audi TTS. That is a $826 annual difference in favour of the Audi TTS.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Z if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi TTS if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan Z takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi TTS will save you roughly $826 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Z and Audi TTS?

The Nissan Z is the cheapest at $76,160 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi TTS by $18,940.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi TTS uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Nissan Z and Audi TTS carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Z makes the most power at 298kW. The Nissan Z is quickest to 100km/h in 4.6s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars