CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Z vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Z vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanToyota
Price (RRP)$76,160$75,600
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power298kW150kW
0-100 km/h4.6s12s
Fuel Economy10.8 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space241L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Nissan Z & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan Z starts from $76,160 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $560.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,776 and $83,160 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Z features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The Nissan Z stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan Z gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Z uses a Petrol producing 298kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The Nissan Z has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Nissan Z is 7.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Z measures 4,380mm long on a 2,550mm wheelbase, 485mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.6m

TightestNissan Z Coupe ManualTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
Worst
Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan ZTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan ZTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 7012.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,078/year for the Nissan Z and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Z) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Z if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Nissan Z and Toyota LandCruiser 70 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Z and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Z by $560.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses the least fuel at 10.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Nissan Z and Toyota LandCruiser 70 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Z makes the most power at 298kW. The Nissan Z is quickest to 100km/h in 4.6s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All Wagons · Best family cars