Nissan Z vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 18 Oct 2026, price 4 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$76,800RRP
- no option data for this car
$75,600RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Nissan Z & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Nissan Z starts from $76,800 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $1,200.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,480 and $83,160 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP's published ratings include no record for the Nissan Z. ANCAP's published record does not give the Toyota LandCruiser 70 a rating. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Nissan Z
- REC-006154 · published 31 Oct 2024Due to a manufacturing issue, the wiring harness behind the front bumper may have been routed incorrectly.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
- REC-005809 · published 2 Nov 2023Due to a manufacturing issue, the mounting screws on the left-hand side front bumper reinforcement bracket may not have been tightened sufficiently.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
Toyota LandCruiser 70
- REC-005079 · published 5 Jul 2016The front fender bracket may fail causing the front fender to become loose.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Nissan Z features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Nissan Z stands out with heated front seats and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Nissan Z gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Nissan Z uses a Petrol producing 298kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.6 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
The Nissan Z has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Nissan Z is 7.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Nissan Z measures 4,380mm long on a 2,550mm wheelbase, 485mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 12.6m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,078/year for the Nissan Z and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Toyota LandCruiser 70.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Z) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Nissan Z if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Toyota LandCruiser 70: Top CarSorted Score, 60 vs 59
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (60 vs 59), taking 2 of 4 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: performance (Nissan Z ahead by 35), practicality (Toyota LandCruiser 70 ahead by 31), reliability (Toyota LandCruiser 70 ahead by 7). The Toyota LandCruiser 70 will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Nissan Z and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Z by $1,200.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses the least fuel at 10.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
ANCAP's published record does not give a rating to Toyota LandCruiser 70, and ANCAP's published ratings include no record for Nissan Z, so there is no crash result to compare.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan Z makes the most power at 298kW. The Nissan Z is quickest to 100km/h in 4.6s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
