Peugeot e-2008 vs Mazda CX-6e
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Peugeot e-2008 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-6e opens at $59,106. That makes the Mazda CX-6e the more affordable entry point by $884.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $65,017 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Peugeot e-2008 stands out with Apple CarPlay and head-up display that you will not find on the Mazda CX-6e. The Mazda CX-6e counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Peugeot e-2008 uses a Electric Motor producing 115kW and 260Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.
The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 54kWh (Peugeot e-2008) vs 77.9kWh (Mazda CX-6e), giving WLTP ranges of 406km and 484km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (Peugeot e-2008) vs 150kW (Mazda CX-6e).
Space & Comfort
The Peugeot e-2008 measures 4,300mm long on a 2,605mm wheelbase, 550mm shorter than the Mazda CX-6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 405L in the Peugeot e-2008 and 468L in the Mazda CX-6e, giving the Mazda CX-6e a 63L advantage.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot e-2008) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Peugeot e-2008 if: You or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-6e takes 7 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-6e has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
