Proton Satria Neo vs Hyundai i30 Hatch
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Proton Satria Neo
Price TBC
Hatchback
—
—
82kW
7.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Hyundai i30 Hatch
From $26,990
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
120kW
7.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
395L
Proton Satria Neo: we're still completing price, seat count, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Proton Satria Neo & Hyundai i30 Hatch
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Hyundai i30 Hatch counters with Apple CarPlay that the Proton Satria Neo does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Proton Satria Neo lines up producing 82kW and 148Nm of torque, sent through a 4-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 13.7 seconds.
The Hyundai i30 Hatch responds with a Petrol making 120kW and 203Nm, paired to a manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 82kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai i30 Hatch is 4.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Proton Satria Neo measures 3,905mm long on a 2,440mm wheelbase, 435mm shorter than the Hyundai i30 Hatch at 4,340mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Hatch generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m diameter
Good
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Proton Satria Neo and $2,081/year for the Hyundai i30 Hatch. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai i30 Hatch.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Proton Satria Neo) vs $2,081 (Hyundai i30 Hatch). The Hyundai i30 Hatch saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years (Proton Satria Neo) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Hatch). The Hyundai i30 Hatch has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Proton Satria Neo if: You or prefer Proton's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Hyundai i30 Hatch if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Hyundai i30 Hatch takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The Hyundai i30 Hatch will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. The Hyundai i30 Hatch adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Proton Satria Neo and Hyundai i30 Hatch?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch is the cheapest at $26,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Proton Satria Neo and Hyundai i30 Hatch carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai i30 Hatch makes the most power at 120kW. The Hyundai i30 Hatch is quickest to 100km/h in 9.4s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
