Mazda Mazda2 vs Proton Satria Neo
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda Mazda2
From $20,495
Hatchback
Petrol
1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT
76kW
6.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
250L
Proton Satria Neo
Price TBC
Hatchback
—
—
82kW
7.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Proton Satria Neo: we're still completing price, seat count, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Proton Satria Neo
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
Drivetrain
The Mazda Mazda2 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT producing 76kW and 135Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.
The Proton Satria Neo lines up making 82kW and 148Nm, paired to a 4-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 13.7 seconds.
The Proton Satria Neo has the clear power advantage at 82kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda Mazda2 measures 3,900mm long on a 2,490mm wheelbase, 5mm shorter than the Proton Satria Neo at 3,905mm (2,440mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda2 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m diameter
Excellent
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Excellent
Clears the U-turn in one swing
Needs about 8.6 m of road; you have 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.7 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $2,109/year for the Proton Satria Neo. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda2.
Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2) vs $2,109 (Proton Satria Neo). The Mazda Mazda2 saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years (Mazda Mazda2) vs 3 years (Proton Satria Neo). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Proton Satria Neo if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Proton's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Mazda Mazda2 and Proton Satria Neo trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda Mazda2 will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Proton Satria Neo?
The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda Mazda2 uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda Mazda2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which is the most powerful?
The Proton Satria Neo makes the most power at 82kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
