CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Kadjar vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Kadjar vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultFord
Price (RRP)TBC$68,990
Fuel typePremium Unleaded 95Diesel
Power117kW184kW
0-100 km/h9.6s
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space408L259L
Towing1,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Renault Kadjar & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Kadjar lines up producing 117kW and 260Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 117kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Kadjar measures 4,449mm long on a 2,646mm wheelbase, 529mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 408L in the Renault Kadjar and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Renault Kadjar a 149L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1478L vs 1818L. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 11.8m

TightestRenault Kadjar LifeTightest turn at 10.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Kadjar Life
10.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Renault Kadjar Life
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault KadjarTightest turn at 10.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Renault KadjarTightest10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Renault Kadjar and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Renault Kadjar.

Warranty: 5 years (Renault Kadjar) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Kadjar if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Renault Kadjar and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Renault Kadjar will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Kadjar has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Kadjar and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Kadjar uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Renault Kadjar, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Kadjar has the largest boot at 408L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs