CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Megane E-Tech vs Mazda CX-6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Megane E-Tech vs Mazda CX-6e

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultMazda
Price (RRP)$54,990$53,990
Range (WLTP)440km484km
Battery60 kWh78 kWh
Power160kW190kW
0-100 km/h7.4s
Max DC Charge130kW194kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min15 min
Boot Space440L363L
Towing1,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The Renault Megane E-Tech starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-6e opens at $53,990. That makes the Mazda CX-6e the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $59,389 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Megane E-Tech features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-6e gets a 26.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Megane E-Tech stands out with head-up display, BOSE audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-6e. The Mazda CX-6e counters with panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Megane E-Tech uses a Electric producing 160kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 160kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 60kWh (Renault Megane E-Tech) vs 78kWh (Mazda CX-6e), giving WLTP ranges of 440km and 484km. DC fast charging peaks at 130kW (Renault Megane E-Tech) vs 194kW (Mazda CX-6e).

Space & Comfort

The Renault Megane E-Tech measures 4,200mm long on a 2,685mm wheelbase, 650mm shorter than the Mazda CX-6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the Renault Megane E-Tech and 363L in the Mazda CX-6e, giving the Renault Megane E-Tech a 77L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-6e leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Renault Megane E-Tech Techno
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-6e GT
11.0m
Worst
Renault Megane E-Tech
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Megane E-Tech) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Megane E-Tech if: You need more boot space, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-6e takes 8 of 9 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Renault Megane E-Tech has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Megane E-Tech and Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Megane E-Tech by $1,000.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Mazda CX-6e has the most range at 484km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Mazda CX-6e accepts the highest DC charging at up to 194kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Renault Megane E-Tech all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-6e has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs