CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kamiq vs Chery Tiggo 7
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kamiq vs Chery Tiggo 7

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaChery
Price (RRP)$29,990$29,990
Power85kW108kW
0-100 km/h10.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space400L475L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kamiq starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kamiq by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kamiq and Chery Tiggo 7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Skoda Kamiq and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 7 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Skoda Kamiq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kamiq uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kamiq measures 4,241mm long on a 2,651mm wheelbase, 299mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 7 at 4,540mm (2,661mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the Skoda Kamiq and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 a 75L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

Chery Tiggo 7 Urban
11.2m
Chery Tiggo 7
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Skoda Kamiq and $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Skoda Kamiq) vs $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs