CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kamiq vs Mazda CX-30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kamiq vs Mazda CX-30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaMazda
Price (RRP)$29,990$29,990
Power85kW114kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space400L350L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kamiq starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kamiq and Mazda CX-30 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Skoda Kamiq and 99% for the Mazda CX-30.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kamiq packs more ADAS features with 4 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kamiq uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kamiq is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kamiq measures 4,241mm long on a 2,651mm wheelbase, 154mm shorter than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the Skoda Kamiq and 350L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Skoda Kamiq a 50L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Skoda Kamiq and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Skoda Kamiq) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-30). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Kamiq takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kamiq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs