CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-30 vs Chery Tiggo 7
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs Chery Tiggo 7

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaChery
Price (RRP)$29,990$29,990
Power114kW108kW
0-100 km/h10.9s9.5s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space350L475L
Towing1,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-30 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-30 and Chery Tiggo 7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 99% for the Mazda CX-30 and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-30 and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 7 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a 6-speed dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 145mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 7 at 4,540mm (2,661mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 a 125L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 7 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 7
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7). The Chery Tiggo 7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Chery Tiggo 7?

The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-30 and Chery Tiggo 7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the largest boot at 475L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Chery Tiggo 7 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs