CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Yeti vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Yeti vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$53,775
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power81kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.7s9.5s
Fuel Economy4.5 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space405L200L
Towing1,500kg3,100kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Skoda Yeti & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Fortuner counters with Apple CarPlay that the Skoda Yeti does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Yeti uses a 2.0 TDI producing 81kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.7 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 81kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota Fortuner is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Yeti measures 4,222mm long on a 2,578mm wheelbase, 573mm shorter than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Fortuner generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 405L in the Skoda Yeti and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Skoda Yeti a 205L advantage. The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.3m to 11.6m

TightestSkoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)Tightest turn at 10.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)
10.3mTighter
Best
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m
Worst
Skoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)
10.3m · Good

Based on 10.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda YetiTightest turn at 10.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda YetiTightest10.3 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Fortuner11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,283/year for the Skoda Yeti and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $883 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Yeti.

Estimated annual total: $1,283 (Skoda Yeti) vs $2,166 (Toyota Fortuner). The Skoda Yeti saves you roughly $883 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 999,999km (Skoda Yeti) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). The Toyota Fortuner has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Yeti if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Fortuner takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Skoda Yeti will save you roughly $883 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Yeti has a clear edge. The Toyota Fortuner adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Yeti and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Yeti uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Yeti all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Yeti has the largest boot at 405L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota Fortuner has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Fortuner makes the most power at 150kW. The Toyota Fortuner is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs