CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Yeti vs Toyota Prado
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Yeti vs Toyota Prado

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$72,500
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power81kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.7s9.6s
Fuel Economy4.5 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space405L408L
Towing1,500kg3,500kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Skoda Yeti & Toyota Prado

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Yeti and Toyota Prado hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Prado packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Skoda Yeti.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Prado counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Skoda Yeti does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Yeti uses a 2.0 TDI producing 81kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.7 seconds.

The Toyota Prado responds with a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The Toyota Prado has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 81kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota Prado is 2.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Yeti measures 4,222mm long on a 2,578mm wheelbase, 768mm shorter than the Toyota Prado at 4,990mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Prado generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 405L in the Skoda Yeti and 408L in the Toyota Prado, giving the Toyota Prado a 3L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.3m to 12.0m

TightestSkoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)Tightest turn at 10.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)
10.3mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m
Worst
Skoda Yeti 81TDI (Manual)
10.3m · Good

Based on 10.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda YetiTightest turn at 10.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda YetiTightest10.3 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Prado12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,283/year for the Skoda Yeti and $2,166/year for the Toyota Prado. That is a $883 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Yeti.

Estimated annual total: $1,283 (Skoda Yeti) vs $2,166 (Toyota Prado). The Skoda Yeti saves you roughly $883 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 999,999km (Skoda Yeti) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Prado). The Toyota Prado has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Yeti if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Prado takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. The Skoda Yeti will save you roughly $883 a year in fuel. The Toyota Prado adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Yeti and Toyota Prado?

The Toyota Prado is the cheapest at $72,500 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Yeti uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Yeti and Toyota Prado all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Prado has the largest boot at 408L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota Prado has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Prado makes the most power at 150kW. The Toyota Prado is quickest to 100km/h in 9.6s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs