CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSubaru Impreza vs Volkswagen Polo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru Impreza vs Volkswagen Polo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSubaruVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$33,490$30,790
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power115kW85kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space291L351L
Towing750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Subaru Impreza & Volkswagen Polo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Subaru Impreza starts from $33,490 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Polo opens at $30,790. That makes the Volkswagen Polo the more affordable entry point by $2,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $36,839 and $33,869 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen Polo by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Subaru Impreza and Volkswagen Polo hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the Subaru Impreza and 94% for the Volkswagen Polo.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volkswagen Polo packs more ADAS features with 3 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Subaru Impreza.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking. Airbag count is 9 in the Subaru Impreza and 6 in the Volkswagen Polo.

Feature Showdown

The Subaru Impreza features a 11.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Polo gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments.

The Volkswagen Polo counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that the Subaru Impreza does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Subaru Impreza uses a Petrol I4 Boxer producing 115kW and 196Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout.

The Volkswagen Polo responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Subaru Impreza has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru Impreza measures 4,490mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 410mm longer than the Volkswagen Polo at 4,080mm (2,564mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Impreza generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 291L in the Subaru Impreza and 351L in the Volkswagen Polo, giving the Volkswagen Polo a 60L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

TightestSubaru Impreza AWD 2.0LTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0L
10.6mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Polo 85TSI Life
10.6m
Best
Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Polo 85TSI Life
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSubaru ImprezaTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Subaru ImprezaTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Volkswagen Polo10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Subaru Impreza and $1,539/year for the Volkswagen Polo. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Polo.

Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Subaru Impreza) vs $1,539 (Volkswagen Polo). The Volkswagen Polo saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Impreza) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Polo). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru Impreza if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Polo if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen Polo takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Polo will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Polo has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Subaru Impreza and Volkswagen Polo?

The Volkswagen Polo is the cheapest at $30,790 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Impreza by $2,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Polo uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Subaru Impreza and Volkswagen Polo all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Polo has the largest boot at 351L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Impreza makes the most power at 115kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars