CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Subaru Impreza
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Subaru Impreza

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthSubaru
Price (RRP)$48,369$33,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW115kW
0-100 km/h6.7s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space185L291L
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Abarth 695 & Subaru Impreza

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $48,369 before on-road costs, while the Subaru Impreza opens at $33,490. That makes the Subaru Impreza the more affordable entry point by $14,879.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,206 and $36,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Abarth 695 by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Subaru Impreza gets a 11.6-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Subaru Impreza. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Subaru Impreza offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 2-zone in the Subaru Impreza.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Subaru Impreza responds with a Petrol I4 Boxer making 115kW and 196Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels.

The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 833mm shorter than the Subaru Impreza at 4,490mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Impreza generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 291L in the Subaru Impreza, giving the Subaru Impreza a 106L advantage. The Subaru Impreza seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

TightestAbarth 695 CompetizioneTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0L
10.6m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAbarth 695Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Abarth 695Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Subaru Impreza10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $2,138/year for the Subaru Impreza. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Abarth 695.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $2,138 (Subaru Impreza). The Abarth 695 saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Impreza). The Subaru Impreza has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru Impreza if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Subaru Impreza takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Abarth 695 will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru Impreza has a clear edge. The Subaru Impreza adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Subaru Impreza?

The Subaru Impreza is the cheapest at $33,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $14,879.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Subaru Impreza all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Impreza has the largest boot at 291L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Subaru Impreza has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars