CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Baleno vs Toyota Corolla Hatch
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Baleno vs Toyota Corolla Hatch

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$32,110
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power68kW103kW
0-100 km/h8.1s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot Space355L217L
Towing1,000kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Suzuki Baleno & Toyota Corolla Hatch

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Baleno features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Corolla Hatch gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Suzuki Baleno stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota Corolla Hatch. The Toyota Corolla Hatch counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Baleno gets fabric upholstery while the Toyota Corolla Hatch offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Baleno uses a K14B VVT producing 68kW and 130Nm of torque, sent through a 4-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Corolla Hatch responds with a 1.8L 4-cyl VVT-i Hybrid making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Toyota Corolla Hatch has the clear power advantage at 103kW vs 68kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Baleno measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 380mm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Hatch at 4,375mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Corolla Hatch generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 355L in the Suzuki Baleno and 217L in the Toyota Corolla Hatch, giving the Suzuki Baleno a 138L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Corolla Hatch leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.8m

TightestSuzuki Baleno GL 1.4 AutoTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Baleno GL 1.4 Auto
9.8mTighter
Best
Toyota Corolla Hatch Ascent Sport Hybrid
10.8m
Worst
Suzuki Baleno GL 1.4 Auto
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Corolla Hatch Ascent Sport Hybrid
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki BalenoTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki BalenoTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Toyota Corolla Hatch10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Suzuki Baleno and $1,140/year for the Toyota Corolla Hatch. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Corolla Hatch.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki Baleno) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Corolla Hatch). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Baleno if: You need more boot space, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Corolla Hatch if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Corolla Hatch takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Toyota Corolla Hatch will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Baleno has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Baleno and Toyota Corolla Hatch?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch is the cheapest at $32,110 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Suzuki Baleno and Toyota Corolla Hatch carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Baleno has the largest boot at 355L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch makes the most power at 103kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars