CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai i30 Hatch vs Suzuki Baleno
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai i30 Hatch vs Suzuki Baleno

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$36,000TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power117kW68kW
0-100 km/h9.4s
Fuel Economy5.6 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space395L355L
Towing1,000kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Hyundai i30 Hatch & Suzuki Baleno

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai i30 Hatch features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Baleno gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai i30 Hatch stands out with wireless charging — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Baleno. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai i30 Hatch gets leather upholstery while the Suzuki Baleno offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai i30 Hatch uses a 1.5 T-Gdi producing 117kW and 253Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dct (dry clutch) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.

The Suzuki Baleno responds with a K14B VVT making 68kW and 130Nm, paired to a 4-speed automatic driving the front wheels.

The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the clear power advantage at 117kW vs 68kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai i30 Hatch measures 4,340mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 345mm longer than the Suzuki Baleno at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Hatch generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 395L in the Hyundai i30 Hatch and 355L in the Suzuki Baleno, giving the Hyundai i30 Hatch a 40L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki Baleno leads with a 1,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.6m

TightestSuzuki Baleno GL 1.4 AutoTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Baleno GL 1.4 Auto
9.8mTighter
Best
Hyundai i30 Hatch N Line
10.6m
Worst
Hyundai i30 Hatch N Line
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Baleno GL 1.4 Auto
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki BalenoTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai i30 Hatch10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki BalenoTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,596/year for the Hyundai i30 Hatch and $1,539/year for the Suzuki Baleno. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Baleno.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Hatch) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki Baleno). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai i30 Hatch if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Baleno if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai i30 Hatch takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Suzuki Baleno will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai i30 Hatch has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai i30 Hatch and Suzuki Baleno?

The Hyundai i30 Hatch is the cheapest at $36,000 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Baleno uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Hyundai i30 Hatch and Suzuki Baleno carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the largest boot at 395L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai i30 Hatch has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai i30 Hatch makes the most power at 117kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars