CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki e Vitara vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki e Vitara vs Nissan X-Trail

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiNissan
Price (RRP)$36,990$37,750
Range (WLTP)344km
Battery49 kWh
Power128kW135kW
0-100 km/h9s8s
Max DC Charge129kW
10-80% Charge Time17 min
Fuel Economy15 kWh/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space306L205L
Towing750kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 300k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki e Vitara starts from $36,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan X-Trail opens at $37,750. That makes the Suzuki e Vitara the more affordable entry point by $760.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,689 and $41,525 respectively.

The Suzuki e Vitara qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Nissan X-Trail, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki e Vitara by roughly $6,945 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki e Vitara and Nissan X-Trail hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 77% for the Suzuki e Vitara and 91% for the Nissan X-Trail.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Nissan X-Trail packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki e Vitara.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki e Vitara uses a Electric Motor producing 128kW and 189Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail lines up making 135kW and 244Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 128kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki e Vitara measures 4,275mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 405mm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail at 4,680mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan X-Trail generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 306L in the Suzuki e Vitara and 205L in the Nissan X-Trail, giving the Suzuki e Vitara a 101L advantage.

For towing, the Nissan X-Trail leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 750kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

Suzuki e Vitara Motion FWD
10.4mTighter
Best
Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.0m
Worst
Suzuki e Vitara
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan X-Trail
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $720/year for the Suzuki e Vitara and $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail. That is a $1,389 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki e Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $720 (Suzuki e Vitara) vs $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail). The Suzuki e Vitara saves you roughly $1,389 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki e Vitara) vs 5 years / 300,000km (Nissan X-Trail). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki e Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan X-Trail takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki e Vitara will save you roughly $1,389 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki e Vitara has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki e Vitara and Nissan X-Trail?

The Suzuki e Vitara is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan X-Trail by $760.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan X-Trail uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki e Vitara and Nissan X-Trail all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki e Vitara has the largest boot at 306L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs