CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Grand Vitara vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiFord
Price (RRP)TBC$59,490
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power122kW154kW
0-100 km/h10.1s
Fuel Economy8.7 L/100km7.2 L/100km
Boot Space398L259L
Towing1,850kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Suzuki Grand Vitara & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that the Suzuki Grand Vitara does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Grand Vitara uses a J24B producing 122kW and 225Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual / 4-speed automatic to a RWD layout.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 122kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Grand Vitara measures 4,500mm long on a 2,640mm wheelbase, 478mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 398L in the Suzuki Grand Vitara and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Suzuki Grand Vitara a 139L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,850kg. That 1,650kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.8m

TightestSuzuki Grand Vitara Urban 2.4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Grand Vitara Urban 2.4
11.0mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Suzuki Grand Vitara Urban 2.4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki Grand VitaraTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki Grand VitaraTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the Suzuki Grand Vitara and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.

Estimated annual total: $2,480 (Suzuki Grand Vitara) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Ford Everest saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Grand Vitara if: You need more boot space, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Everest takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Grand Vitara has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Grand Vitara and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Grand Vitara has the largest boot at 398L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs