CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Jimny vs Hyundai Kona
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Jimny vs Hyundai Kona

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiHyundai
Price (RRP)$33,150$32,500
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power75kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.9s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space85L361L
Towing1,300kg1,300kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the Suzuki Jimny & Hyundai Kona

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Jimny starts from $33,150 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $32,500. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $650.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $36,465 and $35,750 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Jimny features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Jimny gets fabric upholstery while the Hyundai Kona offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Jimny uses a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol, VVT producing 75kW and 130Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a 4WD layout.

The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 75kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Jimny measures 3,650mm long on a 2,250mm wheelbase, 700mm shorter than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Kona generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 85L in the Suzuki Jimny and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the Hyundai Kona a 276L advantage. The Hyundai Kona seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Hyundai Kona leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.6m

TightestSuzuki Jimny LITETightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8mTighter
Best
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m
Worst
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki JimnyTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki JimnyTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Hyundai Kona10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Suzuki Jimny and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Jimny.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Suzuki Jimny) vs $1,881 (Hyundai Kona). The Suzuki Jimny saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Suzuki Jimny) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Jimny if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai Kona takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Jimny will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Kona has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Jimny and Hyundai Kona?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $32,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Jimny by $650.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Jimny uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai Kona all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Kona has the largest boot at 361L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Jimny has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai Kona makes the most power at 110kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs