CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki S-Cross vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki S-Cross vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMazda
Price (RRP)$43,490$39,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power103kW132kW
0-100 km/h10.5s8.7s
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space430L438L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Suzuki S-Cross & Mazda CX-5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki S-Cross starts from $43,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. That makes the Mazda CX-5 the more affordable entry point by $3,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,839 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki S-Cross by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki S-Cross features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Suzuki S-Cross stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki S-Cross gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-5 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki S-Cross uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 132kW and 242Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki S-Cross measures 4,305mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 385mm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,690mm (2,815mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross and 438L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 8L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.2m

Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m
Worst
Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Suzuki S-Cross and $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.

Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Suzuki S-Cross) vs $2,109 (Mazda CX-5). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). The Mazda CX-5 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The Mazda CX-5 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki S-Cross and Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $3,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda CX-5 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-5 makes the most power at 132kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs