CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota GR Supra vs BMW X3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota GR Supra vs BMW X3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Toyota GR Supra: we're still completing warranty, ground clearance, turning circle and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaBMW
Price (RRP)$87,000$86,100
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power285kW140kW
0-100 km/h4.1s8.5s
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space290L570L
Towing2,400kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Toyota GR Supra & BMW X3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota GR Supra starts from $87,000 before on-road costs, while the BMW X3 opens at $86,100. That makes the BMW X3 the more affordable entry point by $900.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $95,700 and $94,710 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota GR Supra features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the BMW X3 gets a 14.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW X3 counters with wireless charging and Bowers & Wilkins audio that the Toyota GR Supra does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota GR Supra uses a 3.0L in-line 6-cylinder turbo petrol producing 285kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic transmission to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.1 seconds.

The BMW X3 responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Toyota GR Supra has the clear power advantage at 285kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota GR Supra is 4.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota GR Supra measures 4,379mm long on a 2,470mm wheelbase, 376mm shorter than the BMW X3 at 4,755mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW X3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 290L in the Toyota GR Supra and 570L in the BMW X3, giving the BMW X3 a 280L advantage. The BMW X3 seats 5 vs 2.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.1m diameter

Large

BMW X3 20 xDrive
12.1m
BMW X3 20 xDrive
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.1 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
BMW X3 Turning circle · Ø 12.1 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Toyota GR Supra and $2,138/year for the BMW X3.

Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Toyota GR Supra) vs $2,138 (BMW X3). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota GR Supra if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW X3 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota GR Supra and BMW X3 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the BMW X3 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota GR Supra and BMW X3?

The BMW X3 is the cheapest at $86,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota GR Supra by $900.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota GR Supra uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BMW X3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW X3 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW X3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,400kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota GR Supra makes the most power at 285kW. The Toyota GR Supra is quickest to 100km/h in 4.1s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best mid-size SUVs