Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs Mazda BT-50
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $65,690 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $29,290.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,259 and $40,040 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda BT-50 by roughly $5,130 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Mazda BT-50 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 86% for the Mazda BT-50.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda BT-50.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 2 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 6 in the Mazda BT-50.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Mazda BT-50 counters with Apple CarPlay that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 151kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.
The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the clear power advantage at 151kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda BT-50 is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,085mm wheelbase, 330mm shorter than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.5m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,050/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $2,024/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $1,026 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.
Estimated annual total: $3,050 (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs $2,024 (Mazda BT-50). The Mazda BT-50 saves you roughly $1,026 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda BT-50 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $1,026 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Mazda BT-50?
The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $29,290.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 makes the most power at 151kW. The Mazda BT-50 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
