CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolkswagen T-Roc vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen T-Roc vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolkswagenMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$44,990$52,990
Power110kW133kW
0-100 km/h9.1s11.5s
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space392L131L
Towing1,800kg3,100kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Volkswagen T-Roc starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport opens at $52,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $8,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $58,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen T-Roc by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Volkswagen T-Roc features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volkswagen T-Roc stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen T-Roc uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport responds with a Diesel making 133kW and 430Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the clear power advantage at 133kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen T-Roc is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen T-Roc measures 4,251mm long on a 2,603mm wheelbase, 534mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport at 4,785mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 392L in the Volkswagen T-Roc and 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, giving the Volkswagen T-Roc a 261L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.4m

Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
10.6mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX
11.4m
Worst
Volkswagen T-Roc
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc and $2,309/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Roc.

Estimated annual total: $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc) vs $2,309 (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Volkswagen T-Roc saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen T-Roc takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen T-Roc will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen T-Roc has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen T-Roc and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport?

The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport by $8,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen T-Roc uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Pajero Sport all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the largest boot at 392L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport makes the most power at 133kW. The Volkswagen T-Roc is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs