CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolvo XC40 vs GWM Tank 500
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volvo XC40 vs GWM Tank 500

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolvoGWM
Price (RRP)$54,990$59,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power145kW255kW
0-100 km/h8.5s8.5s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space460L795L
Towing2,100kg3,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Volvo XC40 & GWM Tank 500

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volvo XC40 starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 500 opens at $59,990. That makes the Volvo XC40 the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $65,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC40 by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Volvo XC40 and GWM Tank 500 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Volvo XC40 and 7 in the GWM Tank 500.

Feature Showdown

The Volvo XC40 features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 500 gets a 14.6-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC40 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the GWM Tank 500. The GWM Tank 500 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC40 gets textile/leather blend upholstery while the GWM Tank 500 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Volvo XC40 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid producing 145kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 500 responds with a Hybrid making 255kW and 648Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 145kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volvo XC40 measures 4,440mm long on a 2,702mm wheelbase, 638mm shorter than the GWM Tank 500 at 5,078mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 500 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 460L in the Volvo XC40 and 795L in the GWM Tank 500, giving the GWM Tank 500 a 335L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 2,100kg. That 900kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestVolvo XC40 Plus B4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m
Worst
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC40Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Volvo XC40Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
GWM Tank 50011.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40 and $2,423/year for the GWM Tank 500. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC40.

Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Volvo XC40) vs $2,423 (GWM Tank 500). The Volvo XC40 saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 500 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Volvo XC40 will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 500 has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volvo XC40 and GWM Tank 500?

The Volvo XC40 is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 500 by $5,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volvo XC40 and GWM Tank 500 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 500 has the largest boot at 795L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 500 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars