CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›XPeng X9 vs Volvo ES90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

XPeng X9 vs Volvo ES90

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

XPeng X9: we're still completing turning circle, braked towing and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecXPengVolvo
Price (RRP)$89,900$88,880
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)535km554km
Battery94.8 kWh92 kWh
Power235kW245kW
0-100 km/h8.2s6.6s
Max DC Charge537kW300kW
10-80% Charge Time12 min22 min
Boot Space721L424L
Towing—1,600kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYes (6kW)No

Track the XPeng X9 & Volvo ES90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The XPeng X9 starts from $89,900 before on-road costs, while the Volvo ES90 opens at $88,880. That makes the Volvo ES90 the more affordable entry point by $1,020.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $98,890 and $97,768 respectively.

Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

94.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 31m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 537kW · 0–80%

11 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 537kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

107kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 43m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

21 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The XPeng X9 features a 15-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo ES90 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The XPeng X9 stands out with Apple CarPlay and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo ES90. The Volvo ES90 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the XPeng X9 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo ES90 offers nordico fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the XPeng X9 and 4-zone in the Volvo ES90.

Drivetrain

The XPeng X9 uses a Electric producing 235kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 responds with a Electric making 245kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 235kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo ES90 is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 94.8kWh (XPeng X9) vs 92kWh (Volvo ES90), giving WLTP ranges of 535km and 554km. DC fast charging peaks at 537kW (XPeng X9) vs 300kW (Volvo ES90).

Space & Comfort

The XPeng X9 measures 5,293mm long on a 3,160mm wheelbase, 293mm longer than the Volvo ES90 at 5,000mm (3,102mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the XPeng X9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 721L in the XPeng X9 and 424L in the Volvo ES90, giving the XPeng X9 a 297L advantage. The XPeng X9 seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.0m diameter

Average

Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m
←
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.0 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Volvo ES90 Turning circle · Ø 12.0 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

2.1 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years (XPeng X9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo ES90). The XPeng X9 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the XPeng X9 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer XPeng's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo ES90 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The XPeng X9 takes 6 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the XPeng X9 has a clear edge. The XPeng X9 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, XPeng X9 and Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 is the cheapest at $88,880 before on-road costs. That undercuts the XPeng X9 by $1,020.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Volvo ES90 has the most range at 554km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The XPeng X9 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 537kW.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of XPeng X9 and Volvo ES90 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The XPeng X9 has the largest boot at 721L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo ES90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The XPeng X9 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo ES90 makes the most power at 245kW. The Volvo ES90 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.6s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · All Sedans · Best electric cars