CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC M8 vs XPeng X9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC M8 vs XPeng X9

Two electric People Movers go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACXPeng
Price (RRP)$76,590TBC
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)106km615km
Battery110 kWh
Electric range106km
Power274kW395kW
0-100 km/h9.5s6.2s
Max DC Charge215kW
10-80% Charge Time20 min
Fuel Economy6.1 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Boot Space800L571L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty8yr / 150k km5yr / 120k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the GAC M8 & XPeng X9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

66kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 3m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 215kW · 0–80%

18 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 215kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC M8 stands out with heated front seats, GAC Premium audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the XPeng X9. The XPeng X9 counters with panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC M8 gets nappa leather upholstery while the XPeng X9 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The GAC M8 uses a Petrol Turbo producing 274kW and 630Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The XPeng X9 responds with a Electric making 395kW and 440Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.2 seconds.

The XPeng X9 has the clear power advantage at 395kW vs 274kW. In the real-world sprint, the XPeng X9 is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC M8 measures 5,212mm long on a 3,070mm wheelbase, 104mm shorter than the XPeng X9 at 5,316mm (2,890mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC M8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 800L in the GAC M8 and 571L in the XPeng X9, giving the GAC M8 a 229L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 12.8m

TightestXPeng X9Tightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
XPeng X9
11.4mTighter
Best
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m
Worst
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
XPeng X9
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestXPeng X9Tightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
GAC M812.8 m
Large△ 3-point
XPeng X9Tightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 8 years / 150,000km (GAC M8) vs 5 years / 120,000km (XPeng X9). The GAC M8 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC M8 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the XPeng X9 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer XPeng's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The XPeng X9 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the GAC M8 has a clear edge. The GAC M8 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC M8 and XPeng X9?

The GAC M8 is the cheapest at $76,590 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC M8 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — XPeng X9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC M8 has the largest boot at 800L.

Which can tow the most?

The XPeng X9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC M8 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The XPeng X9 makes the most power at 395kW. The XPeng X9 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.2s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · Best electric cars