Ford Tourneo vs GAC M8
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular People Movers compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Tourneo
From $71,500
People Mover
Diesel
—
125kW
7.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
672L
GAC M8
From $76,590
People Mover
Plug-in Hybrid
Petrol Turbo
274kW
6.1 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
800L
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Ford Tourneo & GAC M8
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Tourneo starts from $71,500 before on-road costs, while the GAC M8 opens at $76,590. That makes the Ford Tourneo the more affordable entry point by $5,090.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $78,650 and $84,249 respectively.
The GAC M8 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Tourneo, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GAC M8 by roughly $9,080 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Tourneo stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the GAC M8. The GAC M8 counters with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate, GAC Premium audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Tourneo lines up producing 125kW and 390Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a FWD layout.
The GAC M8 responds with a Petrol Turbo making 274kW and 630Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GAC M8 has the clear power advantage at 274kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Tourneo measures 5,050mm long on a 3,100mm wheelbase, 162mm shorter than the GAC M8 at 5,212mm (3,070mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Tourneo generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 672L in the Ford Tourneo and 800L in the GAC M8, giving the GAC M8 a 128L advantage. The Ford Tourneo seats 8 vs 7.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.8m diameter
Large
Based on 12.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Ford Tourneo and $293/year for the GAC M8. That is a $1,816 annual difference in favour of the GAC M8.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Ford Tourneo) vs $293 (GAC M8). The GAC M8 saves you roughly $1,816 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Ford Tourneo) vs 8 years / 150,000km (GAC M8). The GAC M8 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Tourneo if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GAC M8 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GAC M8 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The GAC M8 will save you roughly $1,816 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GAC M8 has a clear edge. The GAC M8 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Tourneo and GAC M8?
The Ford Tourneo is the cheapest at $71,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC M8 by $5,090.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GAC M8 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Ford Tourneo and GAC M8 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The GAC M8 has the largest boot at 800L.
Which has the best warranty?
The GAC M8 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GAC M8 makes the most power at 274kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. Our take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
