CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Tourneo vs Toyota Prado
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Tourneo vs Toyota Prado

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Tourneo: we're still completing 0-100km/h, transmission, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)$71,500$72,500
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power125kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.6s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space672L408L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ford Tourneo & Toyota Prado

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Tourneo starts from $71,500 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Prado opens at $72,500. That makes the Ford Tourneo the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $78,650 and $79,750 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Tourneo features a 13-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Prado gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Ford Tourneo lines up producing 125kW and 390Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Prado responds with a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The Toyota Prado has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Tourneo measures 5,050mm long on a 3,100mm wheelbase, 60mm longer than the Toyota Prado at 4,990mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Tourneo generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 672L in the Ford Tourneo and 408L in the Toyota Prado, giving the Ford Tourneo a 264L advantage. The Ford Tourneo seats 8 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.9m to 12.0m

TightestFord Tourneo ActiveTightest turn at 10.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Tourneo Active
10.9mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m
Worst
Ford Tourneo Active
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord TourneoTightest turn at 10.9m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford TourneoTightest10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Prado12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Ford Tourneo and $2,166/year for the Toyota Prado. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Ford Tourneo.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Ford Tourneo) vs $2,166 (Toyota Prado). The Ford Tourneo saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Tourneo) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Prado). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Tourneo if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Tourneo takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Tourneo will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Tourneo has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Tourneo and Toyota Prado?

The Ford Tourneo is the cheapest at $71,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Prado by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Tourneo uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Prado all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Tourneo has the largest boot at 672L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Prado makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best mid-size SUVs