CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMChery
Price (RRP)$34,990$38,990
Power120kW180kW
0-100 km/h11.8s8.5s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space455L550L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max opens at $38,990. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $4,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $42,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Torres and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the KGM Torres.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the KGM Torres and 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max responds with a Petrol making 180kW and 375Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 20mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max at 4,720mm (2,710mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 95L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

KGM Torres ELX
11.2mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m
Worst
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the KGM Torres.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max). The KGM Torres saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The KGM Torres will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $4,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Torres uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Torres and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs