CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMChery
Price (RRP)$34,990$34,990
Range (WLTP)93km
Battery18.4 kWh
Power120kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.8s9.5s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km1.4 L/100km
Boot Space455L475L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid opens at $34,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $38,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $9,265 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Torres and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the KGM Torres.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the KGM Torres and 8 in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid responds with a Plug-in Hybrid making 150kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 165mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid at 4,535mm (2,653mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid a 20L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.2m

KGM Torres ELX
11.2mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m
Best
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $399/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,853 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $399 (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,853 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,853 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs