CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Suzuki Vitara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Suzuki Vitara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMSuzuki
Price (RRP)$34,990$38,490
Power120kW95kW
0-100 km/h11.8s10.2s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space455L375L
Towing1,500kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $3,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $42,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Vitara by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Torres and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Vitara packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the KGM Torres.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the KGM Torres and 6 in the Suzuki Vitara.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki Vitara is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 525mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the KGM Torres a 80L advantage.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.2m

Suzuki Vitara GLX Turbo
10.2mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Vitara
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Torres takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Suzuki Vitara?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Vitara by $3,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Torres and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW. The Suzuki Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs