CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda BT-50 vs LDV Terron 9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda BT-50 vs LDV Terron 9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaLDV
Price (RRP)$36,400$50,990
Power120kW163kW
0-100 km/h10.9s10.8s
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda BT-50 starts from $36,400 before on-road costs, while the LDV Terron 9 opens at $50,990. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $14,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,040 and $56,089 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda BT-50 by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda BT-50 and LDV Terron 9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Mazda BT-50 and 91% for the LDV Terron 9.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The LDV Terron 9 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda BT-50.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda BT-50 and 7 in the LDV Terron 9.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda BT-50 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the LDV Terron 9 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The LDV Terron 9 counters with MG Sound audio that the Mazda BT-50 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda BT-50 uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The LDV Terron 9 responds with a Diesel Turbo making 163kW and 520Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.8 seconds.

The LDV Terron 9 has the clear power advantage at 163kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the LDV Terron 9 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda BT-50 measures 5,320mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 180mm shorter than the LDV Terron 9 at 5,500mm (3,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the LDV Terron 9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the LDV Terron 9 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 13.3m

Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
LDV Terron 9 Origin
13.3m
Worst
Mazda BT-50
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
LDV Terron 9
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Mazda BT-50 and $2,252/year for the LDV Terron 9. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Estimated annual total: $2,024 (Mazda BT-50) vs $2,252 (LDV Terron 9). The Mazda BT-50 saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50) vs 7 years / 200,000km (LDV Terron 9). The LDV Terron 9 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the LDV Terron 9 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer LDV's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The LDV Terron 9 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. The LDV Terron 9 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda BT-50 and LDV Terron 9?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the LDV Terron 9 by $14,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 and LDV Terron 9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The LDV Terron 9 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The LDV Terron 9 makes the most power at 163kW. The LDV Terron 9 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes