CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan X-Trail vs Isuzu MU-X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan X-Trail vs Isuzu MU-X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanIsuzu
Price (RRP)$37,750$43,900
Power135kW120kW
0-100 km/h8s11s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space205L311L
Towing1,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Nissan X-Trail starts from $37,750 before on-road costs, while the Isuzu MU-X opens at $43,900. That makes the Nissan X-Trail the more affordable entry point by $6,150.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,525 and $48,290 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Isuzu MU-X by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan X-Trail and Isuzu MU-X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Nissan X-Trail and 86% for the Isuzu MU-X.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan X-Trail and 8 in the Isuzu MU-X.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan X-Trail features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Isuzu MU-X gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan X-Trail stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Isuzu MU-X. The Isuzu MU-X counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan X-Trail lines up producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,680mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 180mm shorter than the Isuzu MU-X at 4,860mm (2,855mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 205L in the Nissan X-Trail and 311L in the Isuzu MU-X, giving the Isuzu MU-X a 106L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 782L vs 2138L. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.0mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Nissan X-Trail
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Isuzu MU-X
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Isuzu MU-X has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and Isuzu MU-X?

The Nissan X-Trail is the cheapest at $37,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu MU-X by $6,150.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan X-Trail and Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Isuzu MU-X has the largest boot at 311L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs