Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Peugeot 2008
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 2008 opens at $42,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $12,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $46,739 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Peugeot 2008 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 93% for the Peugeot 2008.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Peugeot 2008 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 6 in the Peugeot 2008.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Peugeot 2008 gets a 10-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and Focal audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 71kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Peugeot 2008 responds with a Hybrid making 100kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.3 seconds.
The Peugeot 2008 has the clear power advantage at 100kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 2008 is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 30mm longer than the Peugeot 2008 at 4,300mm (2,605mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 2008 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 434L in the Peugeot 2008, giving the Peugeot 2008 a 76L advantage.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,625/year for the Peugeot 2008. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,625 (Peugeot 2008). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 2008). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot 2008 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 2008 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Peugeot 2008?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 2008 by $12,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Peugeot 2008 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Peugeot 2008 has the largest boot at 434L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Peugeot 2008 makes the most power at 100kW. The Peugeot 2008 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.3s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
