Abarth 695 vs Volkswagen Polo
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 4 Sep 2026, price 20 Aug 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$37,900RRP
- no option data for this car
$30,790RRP
- with the Abarth 695's standard kit: $30,790 (nothing to add)
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Abarth 695 & Volkswagen Polo
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Polo opens at $30,790. That makes the Volkswagen Polo the more affordable entry point by $7,110.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $33,869 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Abarth 695
None open on our record
Volkswagen Polo
- REC-006631 · published 18 Jun 2026Due to a software issue, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) may fail to illuminate the visual vehicle speed, fuel level and other critical safety information.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
- REC-006370 · published 26 Jun 2025Due to a manufacturing issue, the front passenger airbag may be fitted with a faulty gas generator.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
- REC-005623 · published 21 Feb 2023Due to a software fault, the visual and acoustic seat belt warning system may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2021
- 13 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Polo gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Volkswagen Polo counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Volkswagen Polo offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The Volkswagen Polo responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.
The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 85kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Abarth 695 is 3.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 423mm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo at 4,080mm (2,564mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Polo generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 351L in the Volkswagen Polo, giving the Volkswagen Polo a 166L advantage. The Volkswagen Polo seats 5 vs 4.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 10.6m
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $1,539/year for the Volkswagen Polo. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Polo.
Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Polo). The Volkswagen Polo has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volkswagen Polo if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Volkswagen Polo: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 63
The Volkswagen Polo comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 63), taking 5 of 7 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: performance (Abarth 695 ahead by 22), practicality (Volkswagen Polo ahead by 15), reliability (Volkswagen Polo ahead by 15). The Volkswagen Polo will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Polo has a clear edge. The Volkswagen Polo adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Volkswagen Polo?
The Volkswagen Polo is the cheapest at $30,790 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $7,110.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volkswagen Polo uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Volkswagen Polo holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Abarth 695, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volkswagen Polo has the largest boot at 351L with the seats up.
Which has the best warranty?
The Volkswagen Polo has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
