CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi Q3 vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi Q3 vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiFord
Price (RRP)$61,600$59,490
Power110kW154kW
0-100 km/h9.1s10.1s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km7.2 L/100km
Boot Space575L259L
Towing1,200kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Audi Q3 starts from $61,600 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $59,490. That makes the Ford Everest the more affordable entry point by $2,110.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,760 and $65,439 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q3 by roughly $2,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi Q3 and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Audi Q3 and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Audi Q3.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Audi Q3 and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Audi Q3 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q3 stands out with Apple CarPlay, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi Q3 gets leather upholstery while the Ford Everest offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Audi Q3 uses a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging, MHEV technology and Cylinder on Demand (CoD) producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi Q3 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi Q3 measures 4,531mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 447mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 575L in the Audi Q3 and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Audi Q3 a 316L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 2,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m to 11.8m

Audi Q3 TFSI 110 kW SUV
11.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Audi Q3
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Audi Q3 and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q3.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Audi Q3) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Audi Q3 saves you roughly $427 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi Q3 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi Q3 and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Audi Q3 will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q3 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi Q3 and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q3 by $2,110.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q3 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Audi Q3 and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q3 has the largest boot at 575L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW. The Audi Q3 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs