Audi Q5 Sportback vs Mazda CX-70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Audi Q5 Sportback starts from $83,592 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-70 opens at $76,720. That makes the Mazda CX-70 the more affordable entry point by $6,872.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,951 and $84,392 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q5 Sportback by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Audi Q5 Sportback features a 14.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 11.9-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-70 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.
The Audi Q5 Sportback stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 counters with head-up display and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Audi Q5 Sportback uses a Petrol MHEV producing 150kW and 340Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.
The Mazda CX-70 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Audi Q5 Sportback measures 4,717mm long on a 2,820mm wheelbase, 403mm shorter than the Mazda CX-70 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 515L in the Audi Q5 Sportback and 598L in the Mazda CX-70, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 83L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m diameter
Average
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Audi Q5 Sportback and $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q5 Sportback.
Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Audi Q5 Sportback) vs $2,309 (Mazda CX-70). The Audi Q5 Sportback saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Audi Q5 Sportback) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Audi Q5 Sportback if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-70 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q5 Sportback will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Audi Q5 Sportback and Mazda CX-70?
The Mazda CX-70 is the cheapest at $76,720 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q5 Sportback by $6,872.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Audi Q5 Sportback uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
