CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi Q7 vs Land Rover Defender 130
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi Q7 vs Land Rover Defender 130

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiLand Rover
Price (RRP)$108,815$136,000
Power185kW257kW
0-100 km/h7.3s6.8s
Fuel Economy9.3 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space740L389L
Towing3,500kg3,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Audi Q7 starts from $108,815 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Defender 130 opens at $136,000. That makes the Audi Q7 the more affordable entry point by $27,185.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $119,697 and $149,600 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Land Rover Defender 130 by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Audi Q7 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Defender 130 gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q7 stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Defender 130. The Land Rover Defender 130 counters with wireless charging and Meridian audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi Q7 uses a 4-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection system, turbocharging producing 185kW and 370Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed tiptronic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender 130 responds with a 3.0 i6 D350 Diesel Mild Hybrid making 257kW and 700Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender 130 has the clear power advantage at 257kW vs 185kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Defender 130 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi Q7 measures 5,052mm long on a 2,994mm wheelbase, 47mm shorter than the Land Rover Defender 130 at 5,099mm (3,587mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender 130 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 740L in the Audi Q7 and 389L in the Land Rover Defender 130, giving the Audi Q7 a 351L advantage.

For towing, the Audi Q7 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 12.8m

Audi Q7 45 TFSI quattro
12.5mTighter
Best
Land Rover Defender 130 X-Dynamic SE D350
12.8m
Worst
Audi Q7
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Defender 130
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,651/year for the Audi Q7 and $2,309/year for the Land Rover Defender 130. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Land Rover Defender 130.

Estimated annual total: $2,651 (Audi Q7) vs $2,309 (Land Rover Defender 130). The Land Rover Defender 130 saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender 130). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi Q7 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Defender 130 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi Q7 and Land Rover Defender 130 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Land Rover Defender 130 will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q7 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi Q7 and Land Rover Defender 130?

The Audi Q7 is the cheapest at $108,815 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Defender 130 by $27,185.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Land Rover Defender 130 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Land Rover Defender 130 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q7 has the largest boot at 740L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi Q7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Defender 130 makes the most power at 257kW. The Land Rover Defender 130 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs