CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW M4 vs Lotus Emira
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW M4 vs Lotus Emira

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Lotus Emira: we're still completing price, turning circle and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWLotus
Price (RRP)$168,700TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power353kW268kW
0-100 km/h4.2s4.1s
Fuel Economy10.1 L/100km8.7 L/100km
Boot Space440L151L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW M4 & Lotus Emira

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW M4 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Lotus Emira gets a 10.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW M4 stands out with ventilated seats, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Lotus Emira. The Lotus Emira counters with KEF audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW M4 gets merino leather upholstery while the Lotus Emira offers leather.

Drivetrain

The BMW M4 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Lotus Emira responds with a Turbo petrol making 268kW and 430Nm, paired to a 8-speed dual clutch driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.1 seconds.

The BMW M4 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 268kW. In the real-world sprint, the Lotus Emira is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW M4 measures 4,801mm long on a 2,857mm wheelbase, 388mm longer than the Lotus Emira at 4,413mm (2,575mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BMW M4 and 151L in the Lotus Emira, giving the BMW M4 a 289L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
BMW M4 Turning circle · Ø 11.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the BMW M4 and $2,480/year for the Lotus Emira. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Lotus Emira.

Estimated annual total: $2,879 (BMW M4) vs $2,480 (Lotus Emira). The Lotus Emira saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M4) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Lotus Emira). The BMW M4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW M4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Lotus Emira if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Lotus's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M4 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Lotus Emira will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW M4 has a clear edge. The BMW M4 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW M4 and Lotus Emira?

The BMW M4 is the cheapest at $168,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lotus Emira uses the least fuel at 8.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW M4 and Lotus Emira carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW M4 has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW M4 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M4 makes the most power at 353kW. The Lotus Emira is quickest to 100km/h in 4.1s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars